<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Technology Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetechnologygeek.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com</link>
	<description>Opinion, News &#38; Analysis for The Technology Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 03:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CEO of Macmillan on the e-Book Lawsuit by reddit</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/12/ceo-of-macmillan-on-the-e-book-lawsuit/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>reddit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 03:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/12/ceo-of-macmillan-on-the-e-book-lawsuit/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Have you given any kind of consideration at all with translating your main blog into French? I know a few of translaters right here that would help you do it for no cost if you want to make contact with me personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you given any kind of consideration at all with translating your main blog into French? I know a few of translaters right here that would help you do it for no cost if you want to make contact with me personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Ridiculous Back And Forth With iTunes Technical Support Staff Because iTunes Won&#8217;t Let Me Enter The New Security Information by Ruth</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/27/my-ridiculous-back-and-forth-with-itunes-technical-support-staff-because-itunes-wont-let-me-enter-the-new-security-information/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=337#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Oh my gosh!  Thank you!!!!!

I have had the EXACT same problem/experience with my itunes.  
I did exactly what you said and didn&#039;t enter the &quot;optional&quot; email and I was able to make my purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my gosh!  Thank you!!!!!</p>
<p>I have had the EXACT same problem/experience with my itunes.<br />
I did exactly what you said and didn&#8217;t enter the &#8220;optional&#8221; email and I was able to make my purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 70+ Requests for Final Cut Pro X 10.0.4 by Steve</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>The simple answer is, many do still keep using it - unless they have jumped to another NLE. 
I still use legacy FCP7 for most of my broadcast work but when i get the chance, i play with FCPX on small, none critical projects.
Many of the missing features are back now, in one form or another but it&#039;s the content/metadata management and lack of more than one sequence per project that i can&#039;t yet integrate within existing projects as many are long running tv shows with established workflows that would be hell to mess with.
Plus i really miss the seperate viewer for match framing and checking continuity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple answer is, many do still keep using it &#8211; unless they have jumped to another NLE.<br />
I still use legacy FCP7 for most of my broadcast work but when i get the chance, i play with FCPX on small, none critical projects.<br />
Many of the missing features are back now, in one form or another but it&#8217;s the content/metadata management and lack of more than one sequence per project that i can&#8217;t yet integrate within existing projects as many are long running tv shows with established workflows that would be hell to mess with.<br />
Plus i really miss the seperate viewer for match framing and checking continuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 70+ Requests for Final Cut Pro X 10.0.4 by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Because you can&#039;t buy new copies of it, and if you have to add new machines to a job (which happens quite a lot by the way) then you&#039;re screwed.

The old version had lots wrong with it too. It was getting quite dated in terms of performance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you can&#8217;t buy new copies of it, and if you have to add new machines to a job (which happens quite a lot by the way) then you&#8217;re screwed.</p>
<p>The old version had lots wrong with it too. It was getting quite dated in terms of performance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 70+ Requests for Final Cut Pro X 10.0.4 by Shock Me</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Shock Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/10/top-70-requests-for-final-cut-pro-x-10-0-4/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>The thing that puzzles me is if the previous version had all these wonderful features why don&#039;t they keep using it until Apple or Adobe builds something actually betters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that puzzles me is if the previous version had all these wonderful features why don&#8217;t they keep using it until Apple or Adobe builds something actually betters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook acquires Instagram for $1 billion by Shock Me</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/09/facebook-acquires-instagram-for-1-billion/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Shock Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/04/09/facebook-acquires-instagram-for-1-billion/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Glad I never started using Instagram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I never started using Instagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by Why America Needs Apple &#124; The Technology Geek</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Why America Needs Apple &#124; The Technology Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-423</guid>
		<description>[...] has had on the economic and industrial progress of the US. I wrote a while ago that this was the kind of stories people should be writing about Apple and it&#8217;s good to see a publication like Time doing a non negative piece on Apple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has had on the economic and industrial progress of the US. I wrote a while ago that this was the kind of stories people should be writing about Apple and it&#8217;s good to see a publication like Time doing a non negative piece on Apple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Nonsense Has To Stop by Kahuna</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/21/this-nonsense-has-to-stop/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=305#comment-337</guid>
		<description>I had pre-ordered the the new iPad and it was delivered yesterday. I ignored everything else to marvel at Apple&#039;s latest magical device. And it really is magical.

I already had the 4th generation iPod touch with Retina Display and it served as an inducement for me to get the new iPad. One would expect on a device as tiny as the touch as the touch that the pixels would be small, but on the new iPad the effect is jaw-dropping. The smallest text is razor-sharp and readable, as if it had been on a printed page.

After several hours, the battery was still going strong. I had surfed the net, done emails, watched Youtube....and there was no noticeable heat. None at all.

There will always be those who will target Apple with criticism because it didn&#039;t produce a product that met their &quot;expectations.&quot; What, no holographic projections? No self-charging atomic battery?

Maybe next year.

Now here is _my_ criticism. The new iPad spoils you. You can never look at another screen without realizing that it is old technology. Suddenly, my two year-old iMac seemed...less.

So here is my demand to Apple: I want a new 27&quot; iMac with Retina Display.

And I want it next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had pre-ordered the the new iPad and it was delivered yesterday. I ignored everything else to marvel at Apple&#8217;s latest magical device. And it really is magical.</p>
<p>I already had the 4th generation iPod touch with Retina Display and it served as an inducement for me to get the new iPad. One would expect on a device as tiny as the touch as the touch that the pixels would be small, but on the new iPad the effect is jaw-dropping. The smallest text is razor-sharp and readable, as if it had been on a printed page.</p>
<p>After several hours, the battery was still going strong. I had surfed the net, done emails, watched Youtube&#8230;.and there was no noticeable heat. None at all.</p>
<p>There will always be those who will target Apple with criticism because it didn&#8217;t produce a product that met their &#8220;expectations.&#8221; What, no holographic projections? No self-charging atomic battery?</p>
<p>Maybe next year.</p>
<p>Now here is _my_ criticism. The new iPad spoils you. You can never look at another screen without realizing that it is old technology. Suddenly, my two year-old iMac seemed&#8230;less.</p>
<p>So here is my demand to Apple: I want a new 27&#8243; iMac with Retina Display.</p>
<p>And I want it next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I don&#8217;t think so Google by Hoovenson Haw</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/19/i-dont-think-so-google/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoovenson Haw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/19/i-dont-think-so-google/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Well... Google is probably aiming for the same people Nigerian scammers target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Google is probably aiming for the same people Nigerian scammers target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on By Focussing On Apple, The New York Times Sidelines Bigger Issues With Manufacturing in China by Thoughts on the revelations surrounding Mike Daisey and This American Life &#124; The Technology Geek</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/01/30/by-focussing-on-apple-the-new-york-times-sidelines-bigger-issues-with-manufacturing-in-china/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on the revelations surrounding Mike Daisey and This American Life &#124; The Technology Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=143#comment-292</guid>
		<description>[...] hand by the reporter writing it. I&#8217;ve already made my observations on what was wrong with the New York Times expose so I won&#8217;t go over that again here, but my assertions still stand, and it should in no way be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hand by the reporter writing it. I&#8217;ve already made my observations on what was wrong with the New York Times expose so I won&#8217;t go over that again here, but my assertions still stand, and it should in no way be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by Hans Beier</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Beier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Spot On!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot On!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by Shock Me</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Shock Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I thought it went only rugby players and the unemployed untuck their shirts. Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it went only rugby players and the unemployed untuck their shirts. Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by Nik</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Word.

And BTW only douches and waiters tuck their shirt in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word.</p>
<p>And BTW only douches and waiters tuck their shirt in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by Technology Geek: There&#8217;s a lot more than a lot more than just “hipsters” and “fanboys” buying Apple products &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Geek: There&#8217;s a lot more than a lot more than just “hipsters” and “fanboys” buying Apple products &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-214</guid>
		<description>[...] Thomas: Here, in the midst of a powerful, albeit hopefully waning recession, we have an American company defying all the odds and being incredibly successful. Not only that, it has created an entire subculture of success around it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thomas: Here, in the midst of a powerful, albeit hopefully waning recession, we have an American company defying all the odds and being incredibly successful. Not only that, it has created an entire subculture of success around it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Story That People Should Be Writing About Apple by His cross</title>
		<link>http://thetechnologygeek.com/2012/03/10/the-story-that-people-should-be-writing-about-apple/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>His cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnologygeek.com/?p=248#comment-213</guid>
		<description>That is the only way capitalism works. Preset simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the only way capitalism works. Preset simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

